Kumho CX11
EU tyre label for every size: 24 sizes of this 3PMSF-marked tyre compared with the rest of the market
The Kumho CX11 is a 3PMSF-marked tyre for vans and light trucks. Its supplier has registered it in the EU product database (EPREL) in 24 sizes (34 registrations including load and speed variants), for 15″ to 17″ rims.
Wet grip is rated B in every size, fuel efficiency B–D and external rolling noise 71–73 dB. Every size carries the three-peak mountain snowflake (3PMSF), the mark for tyres tested in severe snow.
The label depends on the size. Sorted by wet grip, then fuel efficiency, then noise, the best-labelled size on sale is 225/75 R16CP (Wet grip B · Fuel efficiency B · 72 dB), the weakest 195/65 R16C (Wet grip B · Fuel efficiency D · 71 dB).
On the EU market since May 2021; the earliest production week registered is 16/2021.
How it compares in its sizes
We compared each size with all other winter and 3PMSF tyres of the same size and class in EPREL (23 sizes had at least four rivals). A size scores when its label is at least as good as 75% of them.
Strongest point: fuel efficiency.
All 24 sizes
The small figure under each class is the share of same-size, same-season tyres this size matches or beats (“–” when fewer than five tyres share the size).
| Size | Load / speed | Wet | Fuel | Noise | Snow / ice | Production from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15″ rims | ||||||
| 195/70 R15CC2 | 104/102R | B89% | C100% | 71 dBB94% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 205/65 R15CC2 | 102/100T | B88% | C100% | 71 dBB97% | 3PMSF | 03/2022 |
| 205/70 R15CC2 | 106/104R | B91% | C99% | 72 dBB63% | 3PMSF | 33/2024 |
| 215/65 R15CC2 | 104/102T | B83% | C100% | 71 dBB93% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 215/70 R15CC2 | 109/107R | B87% | C100% | 71 dBB95% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 215/70 R15CPC2 | 109/107R | B– | C– | 72 dBB– | 3PMSF | 10/2026 |
| 215/70 R15CC2 | 109/107S | B87% | C100% | 73 dBB39% | 3PMSF | 02/2026 |
| 225/70 R15CC2 | 112/110R | B87% | C99% | 71 dBB96% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 225/70 R15CC2 | 112/110S | B87% | C99% | 73 dBB42% | 3PMSF | 02/2026 |
| 16″ rims | ||||||
| 185/75 R16CC2 | 104/102R | B88% | C99% | 72 dBB70% | 3PMSF | 33/2024 |
| 195/60 R16CC2 | 99/97H | B85% | D76% | 71 dBB95% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 195/65 R16CC2 | 104/102T | B90% | D64% | 71 dBB92% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 195/75 R16CC2 | 107/105R · 110/108R | B84% | C100% | 71 dBB93% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 195/75 R16CC2 | 110/108T | B84% | C100% | 73 dBB37% | 3PMSF | 02/2026 |
| 205/65 R16CC2 | 107/105T | B88% | C99% | 71 dBB95% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 205/75 R16CC2 | 110/108R · 113/111R | B82% | C99% | 71 dBB96% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 215/60 R16CC2 | 103/101T | B88% | C100% | 71 dBB93% | 3PMSF | 35/2021 |
| 215/65 R16CC2 | 109/107T | B87% | C99% | 71 dBB95% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 215/75 R16CC2 | 116/114R | B88% | C99% | 71 dBB96% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 225/65 R16CC2 | 112/110R | B86% | C99% | 71 dBB94% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 225/65 R16CC2 | 112/110T | B86% | C99% | 73 dBB41% | 3PMSF | 02/2026 |
| 225/75 R16CPC2 | 118/116R · 118/116R · 118/116R · 118/116R | B50% | B100% | 72 dBB88% | 3PMSF | 33/2024 |
| 225/75 R16CC2 | 121/120R | B86% | C98% | 71 dBB95% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 235/65 R16CC2 | 115/113R · 121/119R | B84% | C97% | 71 dBB95% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 17″ rims | ||||||
| 205/70 R17CC2 | 115/113R | B83% | C100% | 71 dBB83% | 3PMSF | 11/2022 |
| 215/60 R17CC2 | 109/107T | B82% | C96% | 71 dBB87% | 3PMSF | 16/2021 |
| 225/55 R17CC2 | 109/107H | B72% | C100% | 71 dBB99% | 3PMSF | 35/2021 |
| 235/60 R17CC2 | 117/115S | B86% | C97% | 72 dBB90% | 3PMSF | 11/2022 |
Same label values, different brand
These tyres have exactly the same label values as the Kumho CX11 in most of the sizes they share, and both are registered in EPREL by the same manufacturer. Identical labels do not prove two tyres are the same: classes are broad. But consistent matches across many sizes point to a shared production family.
- Marshal CX11identical label in 17 of 17 shared size and load/speed variants
Questions
Is the Kumho CX11 a quiet tyre?
Its declared rolling noise ranges from 71 dB to 73 dB (median 71 dB). In 91% of the sizes we could compare, it is at least as quiet as three quarters of same-size rivals.
How good is the Kumho CX11 in the wet?
Its wet grip class is B. In 91% of compared sizes that is at least as good as three quarters of same-size rivals.
Is the Kumho CX11 suitable for snow?
34 of 34 registrations carry the 3PMSF symbol, which means the tyre passed the EU severe-snow test. Check the exact size in the table.
When was the Kumho CX11 launched?
It has been on the EU market since May 2021. The earliest production week in its registrations is 16/2021; the DOT code on the sidewall shows the week and year of your tyre.
More from Kumho
Source: EPREL, the European Commission’s product registry for energy labelling — 34 registrations, data as of 23 October 2026. Suppliers have updated 24 of these registrations since first publication. Label values are the supplier’s declaration.